![]() ![]() It's sad that the first effort to dramatize this author's work is such a weak effort. The characters, starting with Inspector Gamache, are as well developed as any that I have read in this genre. Louise Penney has created a fascinating subculture in Quebec. I doubt, too, that she had much to say about it. Have the producers/director no loyalty to the books at all? If Penney is one of the executive producers, as referred to in other reviews, I cannot imagine that she feels the movie faithfully represents her literary work. It was peculiar, as well, to see what Penney describes as the surreal, provocative artwork of murder-victim Jane,(thus killing off a main and recurring character in the books) represented as poorly-rendered American Primitive. It's a shame to see Penney's deeply thoughtful works reduced to such shallowness. Scenes are very short, pushing the plot ahead in only the barest, least thought-provoking manner. ![]() The use of that husky, almost-whisper voice (who talks like that?) also betrays the cookie-cutter approach to this movie. The characters, instead of being complex and unpredictable, are stilted, their utterances short, too fast, emotionless-a sign of poor direction and/or poor acting. The cast is impossibly good looking, with that plastic, every-hair-in-place, perfect make-up at all times look so common to made-for-TV movies. There is in the movie none of the sensitivity, insight, philosophizing that makes the books so compelling. How disappointing to find that all that has been reduced to soap opera standards. I wanted to like this movie, having read all of Louise Penney's atmospheric, intelligent, introspective books featuring Armand Gamache. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |